Correlation of surface area and ID/IG ratio of coconut shell graphene carbon synthesized using Hummers method: A review

Yana Fitri Anggreni, Rita Lestari, Seftri Harika, Yurike Fatmawati, Delovita Ginting, Romi Fadli Syahputra

Abstract


Graphene from coconut shells has been widely developed by previous studies, graphene has excellent conductivity properties that are widely applied in electronics to sensors. Coconut shells are chosen as raw materials for making graphane because of their high carbon content, and are also environmentally friendly. Characteristics can be identified by the Raman curve to determine the peak values of D and G where Peak D is the defective part of the graphene structure and Peak G is the inner part of graphene in crystalline form. This article discusses the ID/IG values synthesized from coconut shell materials. Based on the last 5 years of journals, this review discusses the surface area and ID/IG values of the 25 journals that I have read, the most widely used journal is the Hummers method, because this method is easy to understand to determine the comparative value of ID/IG, surface area, and correlation between the two parameters. The resulting nanocomposites were analyzed using Raman Spectroscopy to determine the ID/IG value and BET Analysis to measure its surface area. The results obtained showed that the ID/IG value was in the range of 0.85 to 1.15, while the measured surface area ranged from 40 to 120 m2/g. Statistical analysis shows that the Pearson correlation value between the surface area and ID/IG value is -0.028, indicating a very weak relationship and almost no linear correlation between these two variables. The p-value of 0.932 also shows that this correlation is not statistically significant. This indicates that increasing or decreasing the surface area of graphene-magnetite nanocomposites has no direct effect on the ID/IG ratio.

Keywords


Coconut shell; graphene; Hummers method; Raman spectroscopy; surface area

Full Text:

PDF

References


1. Danilov, M. O., Slobodyanyuk, I. A., Rusetskii, I. A., & Kolbasov, G. Y. (2013). Reduced graphene oxide: a promising electrode material for oxygen electrodes. Journal of Nanostructure in Chemistry, 3(1), 49.

2. Ristiani, D., Asih, R., Astuti, F., Baqiya, M. A., Kaewhan, C., Tunmee, S., Nakajima, H., & Soontaranon, S. (2022). Mesostructural study on graphenic-based carbon prepared from coconut shells by heat treatment and liquid exfoliation. Heliyon, 8(3).

3. Putri, N. A. & Supardi, Z. A. I. (2023). Sintesis dan karakterisasi graphene oxide (GO) dari bahan alam tempurung kelapa. Inovasi Fisika Indonesia, 12(2), 47–55.

4. Keppetipola, N. M., Dissanayake, M., Dissanayake, P., Karunarathne, B., Dourges, M. A., Talaga, D., Servant, L., Olivier, C., Toupance, T., Uchida, S. and Tennakone, K., Kumara, A., & Cojocaru, L. (2021). Graphite-type activated carbon from coconut shell: a natural source for eco-friendly non-volatile storage devices. RSC Advances, 11(5), 2854–2865.

5. Zaman, K. (2021). Pengaruh Graphene Oxide (GO) Grafit Pensil sebagai Additive untuk Meningkatkan Strength Semen Pemboran. Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Riau.

6. Hidayat, R. (2021). Fabrikasi dari batok kelapa menggunakan konvensional Studi awal tentang bahan mirip graphene perapian. Journal Fisika Seri Konferensi, 1876(2021), 012005.

7. Kumar, N., Salehiyan, R., Chauke, V., Botlhoko, O. J., Setshedi, K., Scriba, M., Masukume, M., & Ray, S. S. (2021). Top-down synthesis of graphene: A comprehensive review. FlatChem, 27, 100224.

8. Mbayachi, V. B., Ndayiragije, E., Sammani, T., Taj, S., & Mbuta, E. R. (2021). Graphene synthesis, characterization and its applications: A review. Results in Chemistry, 3, 100163.

9. Xiao, Y., Pang, Y. X., Yan, Y., Qian, P., Zhao, H., Manickam, S., Wu, T., & Pang, C. H. (2023). Synthesis and functionalization of graphene materials for biomedical applications: recent advances, challenges, and perspectives. Advanced Science, 10(9), 2205292.

10. Khadifah, F. M., & Nurisal, R. (2017). Sintesis Graphene Berbasis Arang Tempurung Kelapa dengan Metode Hummers Termodifikasi. Doctoral dissertation, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember.

11. Menon, S. D., Sampath, K., & Kaarthik, S. S. (2021). Feasibility studies of coconut shells biomass for downdraft gasification. Materials Today: Proceedings, 44, 3133–3137.

12. Korucu, H. (2024). Optimization of Graphene Oxide Synthesis Using Hummers Method. Gazi University Journal of Science, 37(3), 1132–1152.

13. Duval, A. & Lawoko, M. (2014). A review on lignin-based polymeric, micro-and nano-structured materials. Reactive and Functional Polymers, 85, 78–96.

14. Tambe, P. (2022). Synthesis and characterization of acid treated reduced graphene oxide. Materials Today: Proceedings, 49, 1294–1297.

15. Chandran, A., Unnikrishnan, N. V., Jayaraj, M. K., John, R. E., & George, J. (2023). Recent advances in graphene and graphene-based technologies. IOP Publishing.

16. Paton, K. R., Despotelis, K., Kumar, N., Turner, P., & Pollard, A. J. (2023). On the use of Raman spectroscopy to characterize mass-produced graphene nanoplatelets. Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology, 14(1), 509–521.

17. Dalai, B., Patra, B., Das, N., Sahoo, R., Sahoo, D. K., Parida, C., & Dash, S. K. (2023). Synthesis, Characteristics and Applications of Graphene Composites: A Survey. Journal of the Turkish Chemical Society Section A: Chemistry, 10(3), 757–772.

18. Alagoz, E. & Mengen, A. E. (2024). Shale Characterization Methods Using XRD, CEC, and LSM: Experimental Findings. Petroleum & Petrochemical Engineering Journal, 8(1), 1–10.

Zhang, C. C., Hartlaub, S., Petrovic, I., & Yilmaz, B. (2022). Raman spectroscopy characterization of amorphous coke generated in industrial processes. ACS Omega, 7(3), 2565–2570.

20. Robertson, A. W., Warner, J. H., Schäffel, F., Rümmeli, M. H., & Ibrahim, I. (2012). Applications of Graphene. 2012.

21. Chen, Z., An, X., Dai, L., & Xu, Y. (2020). Holey graphene-based nanocomposites for efficient electrochemical energy storage. Nano Energy, 73, 104762.

22. Pradhan, S. & Yadavalli, V. K. (2024). A dual function conductive nano ink for printed electronics connections. Organic Electronics, 124, 106959.

23. Htwe, Y. Z. N., Abdullah, M. K., & Mariatti, M. (2022). Water-based graphene/AgNPs hybrid conductive inks for flexible electronic applications. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 16, 59–73.

24. Omokafe, S. M., Adeniyi, A. A., Igbafen, E. O., Oke, S. R., & Olubambi, P. A. (2020). Fabrication of activated carbon from coconut shells and its electrochemical properties for supercapacitors. International Journal of Electrochemical Science, 15(11), 10854–10865.

25. Nadzri, S. N. I. H. A., Sultan, M. T. H., Shah, A. U. M., Safri, S. N. A., Talib, A. R. A., Jawaid, M., & Basri, A. A. (2022). A comprehensive review of coconut shell powder composites: Preparation, processing, and characterization. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 35(12), 2641–2664.

26. Bellow, S. A., Agunsoye, J. O., Adebisi, J. A., Kolawole, F. O., & Hassan, S. B. (2016). Physical properties of coconut shell nanoparticles. Kathmandu University Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology, 12(1), 63-79.

27. Satheesh, M., Pugazhvadivu, M., Prabu, B., Gunasegaran, V., & Manikandan, A. (2019). Synthesis and characterization of coconut shell ash. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, 19(7), 4123–4128.

28. Gunasekaran, K., Kumar, P. S., & Lakshmipathy, M. (2011). Mechanical and bond properties of coconut shell concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 25(1), 92–98.

29. Prakash, R., Divyah, N., Srividhya, S., Avudaiappan, S., Amran, M., Naidu Raman, S., Guindos, P., Vatin, N. I., & Fediuk, R. (2022). Effect of steel fiber on the strength and flexural characteristics of coconut shell concrete partially blended with fly ash. Materials, 15(12), 4272.

30. Patchkovskii, S., Tse, J. S., Yurchenko, S. N., Zhechkov, L., Heine, T., & Seifert, G. (2005). Graphene nanostructures as tunable storage media for molecular hydrogen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(30), 10439–10444.

31. Jiang, J. W., Wang, J. S., & Li, B. (2009). Young’s modulus of graphene: a molecular dynamics study. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 80(11), 113405.

32. Sheehy, D. E. & Schmalian, J. (2009). Optical transparency of graphene as determined by the fine-structure constant. Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 80(19), 193411.

33. Singh, V., Joung, D., Zhai, L., Das, S., Khondaker, S. I., & Seal, S. (2011). Graphene based materials: past, present and future. Progress in Materials Science, 56(8), 1178–1271.

34. Hattab, H., N’Diaye, A. T., Wall, D., Klein, C., Jnawali, G., Coraux, J., Busse, C., van Gastel, R., Poelsema, B., Michely, T., Meyer zu Heringdorf, F. J., & Horn-von Hoegen, M. (2012). Interplay of wrinkles, strain, and lattice parameter in graphene on iridium. Nano letters, 12(2), 678-682.

35. Adhytiawan, A. A. & Susanti, D. (2015). Pengaruh Variasi Waktu Tahan Hidrotermal terhadap Sifat Kapasitif Superkapasitor Material Graphene. Jurnal Teknik ITS, 4(1), F45–F50.

36. Ofomata, E. C. & Okonkwo, N. A. (2022). Production or activated carbon from coconut shell using different chemicals and comparative analysis of the adsorption efficiencies. Journal of Chemical Society of Nigeria, 47(3).

37. Cox, J. M., Frick, J. J., Liu, C., Li, Z., Ozbakir, Y., Carraro, C., Maboudian, R., & Senesky, D. G. (2025). Thermal conductivity of macroporous graphene aerogel measured using high resolution comparative infrared thermal microscopy. Journal of Porous Materials, 32(1), 47–53.

38. Marsyahyo, E. (2009). Analisis Brunnaeur Emmet Teller (Bet) Topografi Permukaan Serat Rami (Boehmeria Nivea) Untuk Media Penguatan Pada Bahan Komposit. Jurnal Flywheel, 2(2), 33–41.

39. Kusumaningtyas, M. P. (2017). Analisis Struktur Nano Batu Apung Lombok Menggunakan Metode BET (Brunauer-Emmett-Teller). Skripsi Departemen Fisika FMIPA, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya.

40. Rustanto, M. E., Yudita, Y., & Ilcham, A. (2022). Manufacture of Capacitors from Activated Carbon from Used Batteries, Chicken Bones and Banana Skins: Manufacture of Capacitors from Activated Carbon from Used Batteries, Chicken Bones and Banana Skins. Jurnal Rekayasa, Teknologi Proses dan Sains Kimia (REPROKIMIA), 1(2), 54–62.

41. Ifa, L., Syarif, T., Sartia, S., Juliani, J., Nurdjannah, N., & Kusuma, H. S. (2022). Techno-economics of coconut coir bioadsorbent utilization on free fatty acid level reduction in crude palm oil. Heliyon, 8(3).

42. Miri, N. S. S. Narimo. (2022). Review: kajian persamaan isoterm langmuir dan freundlich pada adsorpsi logam berat Fe (II) dengan zeolit dan karbon aktif dari biomassa. Jurnal Kimia dan Rekayasa, 2(2), 58–71.

43. Dewayanti, N. A. A. (2018). Sintesis Graphene-Like Berbasis Biomassa Tempurung Kelapa serta Aplikasinya Sebagai Elektroda pada Metal-Air Battery. Doctoral dissertation, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember.

44. Bumbrah, G. S., & Sharma, R. M. (2016). Raman spectroscopy–Basic principle, instrumentation and selected applications for the characterization of drugs of abuse. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 6(3), 209–215.

45. Simón, M., Benítez, A., Caballero, A., Morales, J., & Vargas, O. (2018). Untreated natural graphite as a graphene source for high-performance li-ion batteries. Batteries, 4(1), 13.

46. Sarjani, V. S. Y., Witri, P. S., Giovandi, T., Widiyastuti, W., Rois, M. F., & Setyawan, H. (2020). Synthesis of reduced graphene oxide/MnO2 nanocomposites for oxygen reduction reaction catalyst. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2219(1), 080004.

47. Fahmi, F., Dewayanti, N. A. A., Widiyastuti, W., & Setyawan, H. (2020). Preparation of porous graphene-like material from coconut shell charcoals for supercapacitors. Cogent Engineering, 7(1), 1748962.

48. Lee, K. C., Lim, M. S. W., Hong, Z. Y., Chong, S., Tiong, T. J., Pan, G. T., & Huang, C. M. (2021). Coconut shell-derived activated carbon for high-performance solid-state supercapacitors. Energies, 14(15), 4546.

49. Jiang, Y., Li, J., Jiang, Z., Shi, M., Sheng, R., Liu, Z., Zhang, S., Cao, Y., Wei, T., & Fan, Z. (2021). Large-surface-area activated carbon with high density by electrostatic densification for supercapacitor electrodes. Carbon, 175, 281–288.

50. Sankar, S., Ahmed, A. T. A., Inamdar, A. I., Im, H., Im, Y. B., Lee, Y., Kim, D. Y., & Lee, S. (2019). Biomass-derived ultrathin mesoporous graphitic carbon nanoflakes as stable electrode material for high-performance supercapacitors. Materials & Design, 169, 107688.

51. Wang, H., Sun, J., Wang, J., Jiang, L., & Liu, H. (2021). Green synthesis of nitrogen and fluorine co-doped porous carbons from sustainable coconut shells as an advanced synergistic electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 13, 962–970.

52. Cao, L., Li, Y., Zhou, T., Gan, L., Song, H., Fang, X., Shi, K., Jiang, Y., Ge, X., & Zhou, J. (2024). Electroadsorption desalination performance of carbon materials derived from coconut shell without membrane separation. Desalination and Water Treatment, 319, 100401.

53. Destyorini, F., Irmawati, Y., Hardiansyah, A., Widodo, H., Yahya, I. N. D., Indayaningsih, N., Yudianti, R., Hsu, Y. I., & Uyama, H. (2021). Formation of nanostructured graphitic carbon from coconut waste via low-temperature catalytic graphitisation. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 24(2), 514–523.

54. Cao, L., Li, Y., Zhou, T., Gan, L., Song, H., Fang, X., Shi, K., Jiang, Y., Ge, X., & Zhou, J. (2024). Electroadsorption desalination performance of carbon materials derived from coconut shell without membrane separation. Desalination and Water Treatment, 319, 100401.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31258/jkfi.22.3.249-258

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Indexing by:

  

 

Image